Mohan Bhagwat
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat on Wednesday dismissed recent speculation that he had spoken about retirement at the age of 75 or suggested that others, including political leaders, should step aside after reaching that age. Speaking at an interaction session with swayamsevaks and the media, Bhagwat clarified that his remarks were taken out of context and misinterpreted. He stressed that the Sangh Parivar believes in collective discipline, not individual diktats, and that RSS workers act only in accordance with the organization’s principles.
Context of the Controversy
The debate over age and leadership has long been a sensitive subject in Indian politics. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is 74 and will turn 75 in September 2025. Over the years, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has unofficially followed a “75-year age rule” for key positions, which led to the sidelining of several senior leaders such as L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, and others. This precedent has often triggered speculation about whether the same rule would apply to Modi once he reaches that age.
When Bhagwat made comments earlier this month about leadership, many interpreted them as a subtle indication that leaders above 75 should make way for the younger generation. Opposition parties seized on the remarks, questioning Modi’s political future. However, Bhagwat has now issued a categorical denial.
Bhagwat’s Clarification
“Some people are spreading the narrative that I said I will retire at 75 or that someone else should retire at 75. This is completely false. I never made such a statement,” Bhagwat said. “The Sangh has no rule of retirement. Our tradition is of service till the end of life. Whoever has strength, capacity, and dedication continues to work.”
He further underlined that RSS workers function with discipline and commitment. “RSS workers do what the Sangh decides. Personal ambitions or interpretations do not matter. The Sangh has its own way of deciding roles and responsibilities, and it is not dependent on political speculation,” Bhagwat added.
Implications for Politics
The timing of Bhagwat’s clarification is significant. With the 2029 general elections already being discussed in political circles, speculation over Modi’s leadership beyond 75 had become a talking point. Some opposition leaders had suggested that the BJP would have to look for a new face after 2025.
By distancing himself from the age debate, Bhagwat has not only shielded the RSS from political controversies but also left the question of Modi’s continuation open-ended. Within the BJP, Modi’s stature remains unchallenged, and his authority is unquestioned. Bhagwat’s statement effectively removes any perceived pressure on the Prime Minister regarding age limits.
RSS Tradition and Leadership Model
The RSS has historically rejected rigid retirement norms. Its founding members, including K.B. Hedgewar and M.S. Golwalkar, served in leadership roles until their last days. Even in the organizational setup, senior pracharaks often continue active work well into their late 70s and 80s, provided they are physically able.
Bhagwat’s emphasis on service until one’s capacity permits is consistent with this tradition. In fact, he reminded swayamsevaks that the Sangh is not bound by the same frameworks that govern political parties or corporate bodies. Instead, it functions as a cultural and ideological movement with flexible roles for those dedicated to its mission.
Reaction from Political Circles
Opposition leaders, who had earlier latched onto Bhagwat’s reported remarks, criticized his clarification, suggesting that the RSS was attempting to shield Modi. Congress spokespersons argued that the “age rule” had always been selectively applied within the BJP, pointing out how senior leaders were forced to retire while Modi himself was exempted.
BJP leaders, on the other hand, welcomed Bhagwat’s statement, emphasizing that it put an end to unnecessary speculation. A senior BJP functionary said, “The Prime Minister’s leadership is beyond question. Age is just a number when it comes to someone’s capacity to serve. Bhagwat ji’s clarification reinforces that.”
Broader Message
Bhagwat’s denial carries a broader message to both swayamsevaks and the public: the RSS does not allow individual interpretations to dictate its organizational discipline. By making it clear that the Sangh has no retirement age, he has reasserted the principle of lifelong service.
His comments also reflect an effort to keep the RSS insulated from direct political debates, even though its influence on the BJP is widely acknowledged. In recent years, Bhagwat has repeatedly said that while the RSS shares ideological roots with the BJP, it does not interfere in the party’s internal decisions.
Conclusion
Mohan Bhagwat’s clarification puts to rest, at least for now, the swirling speculation about age and retirement in political leadership. By rejecting the idea of a 75-year retirement threshold, he has reaffirmed the Sangh’s ethos of lifelong service and discipline.
For Prime Minister Modi, the statement comes as a reassurance that his leadership remains unchallenged within the ideological family he belongs to. For the opposition, however, it may mean one less talking point against the BJP as the political discourse gears up for the future.
Ultimately, Bhagwat’s message is clear: neither age nor personal ambition, but dedication to service, defines leadership in the Sangh’s worldview.
Thnaks For Reading